Monday, 15 December 2008

Structure of debates

Listinening in to room 2, the flow of debate seems very logical: define the issue, identify the sticking points, get the groups to work through the sticking points informally, back to plenary to confirm the outcomes, summarise, move on.

Room 1 seems muss less structured, often I'm not sure exactly what is being discussed or agreed or disagreed (but then I'm not giving it my full attention).

No comments: